The Rapid Elearning Blog

downside-e-learning content

When I first learned to build e-learning courses, the general instruction for building e-learning content was to craft some learning objectives, organize and present the content, and then assess the learners using some sort of simple quiz. I think that’s how a lot of people learned to build courses with many of them following a similar structure.

Back in those days, the course authoring tools weren’t easily available and building something overly sophisticated required a lot more resources. Thus, many courses were relatively simple in terms of the instructional design and the e-learning content. Nowadays, there are much more sophisticated authoring tools available, so you can build e-learning courses that are more creative and engaging.

While the tools are easier to use and there is more information available on how to build a better e-learning course, most courses still follow the same general structure: objectives, content, and quiz.

typical e-learning course

This makes sense because it’s organized, seems logical, and most e-learning course expectations probably lean more into the explainer-type content than performance. So it’s more about presenting content and a simple assessment than it is a robust learning experience.

This approach is very similar to how we’d build products on an assembly line in a factory. Design something that generally meets the needs for most people and push it out to everyone. There’s nothing wrong with this approach per se. If your content is well-designed and engaging, it can work just fine. This is especially true if all you need is tracked completion and there are no real performance requirements for the course.

However, it does have its downsides. For one, it assumes that all of the information is equally relevant to the learners and meets their learning needs. And in a world where learners are used to getting what they want when they want it, the one-size-fits-all approach to e-learning just doesn’t cut it anymore.

So what’s the solution?

Here are three general ideas to stimulate your thinking when it comes to e-learning content:

  • Stay in the right lane. This may sound a bit cynical, but many courses may be important to the organization and annual compliance, but not relevant to the end user. Assembly line courses are fine for that. Don’t overbuild them and get the learners in and out and back to something more productive.
  • As note above, keep the content-heavy courses simple and build the right decision-making activities in the courses that are more meaningful and tied to performance metrics.
  • The key to successful learning is meaningful content and activities. Ultimately, the courses should be relevant to the learners and mirror how they’d use the content in real life. Create situations that simulate the decisions they need to make and present your content through those simulations rather than as a a series of bullet-point screens.

That’s enough to get you thinking. What would you add?


Free E-Learning Resources

Want to learn more? Check out these articles and free resources in the community.

Here’s a great job board for e-learning, instructional design, and training jobs

Participate in the weekly e-learning challenges to sharpen your skills

Get your free PowerPoint templates and free graphics & stock images.

Lots of cool e-learning examples to check out and find inspiration.

Getting Started? This e-learning 101 series and the free e-books will help.

6 responses to “The Downside of Most E-Learning Content”

I would just add that when you develop a course, just put the material in that is required to cover the objectives. This usually prevents overloading the students with superfluous information.

September 21st, 2022

This might not be directly related to the content per se, but to get to effective learning it is also important to get the learner feedback on a particular course. This can help improve upon the existing solutions for future learners.

I think this is very practical guidance. Often times we are required to produce eLearning which is knowledge or awareness base and without performance outcomes. It makes sense to follow a more direct approach, get employees through the training and back to their jobs. On the other hand, performance-based eLearning should be built with performance on the job as a measurement of success.

September 21st, 2022

@Rick: Good point. I think it’s always a challenge to get the stakeholders and SMEs to let go of some of their content.

September 21st, 2022

@Pooja: You’re correct, it’s important to iterate and build courses based on feedback from the people who take the courses.

September 21st, 2022

@Chet: I think a lot of organizations put too much effort into the courses where they don’t really care about it’s effectiveness. It’s not an ideal situation. But it is a reality. I always like to sort those types of courses so I have resources for the important ones.